Burke County Schools (120) Annual Public Report for Students with Disabilities

School Year: 2005-06

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) requires each state to submit a State Performance Plan (SPP). The SPP is a six-year performance plan which evaluates the State’s efforts to implement the requirements of IDEA and improve results for students with disabilities. It describes how North Carolina will improve its performance on 20 prescribed indicators. Fourteen of the SPP indicators (Indicators 1-14) focus on educational outcomes for students with disabilities, as well as compliance with IDEA requirements. The last six SPP indicators (Indicators 15 -20) review the State Education Agency's general supervision authority under IDEA. North Carolina established measurable and rigorous targets for each indicator and must report annually through the Annual Performance Report (APR) on the performance of the state. The IDEA also requires states to report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency on certain indicators. This year, reporting on Indicators 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, and 12 is required and is based on data collected during the 2005-06 school year.

To review the North Carolina SPP/APR, visit the following link:

www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/ec/policy/policies/2007spp.pdf

Annual Performance Report Legend
--     No Data Available
*      Less than 5 students in the category and data masked for confidentiality
N/A    This particular metric does not apply for this district

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate

Percent of youth with individualized education programs (IEPs) graduating from high school with a regular diploma compared to percent of all youth in the district graduating with a regular diploma.

Graduation Rate State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
Students with disabilities > 50.0 50.0 Yes 42.37 No
All students N/A 68.7 N/A 60.6 N/A


Note: "All students" includes students with disabilities. No SPP targets are set for all students.

Indicator 2: Dropout Rate

Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school compared to the percent of all youth in the district dropping out of high school.

Dropout Rate State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
Students with disabilities < 7.5 9.21 No 10.04 No
All students N/A 5.04 N/A 5.9 N/A


Note: "All students" includes students with disabilities. No SPP targets are set for all students.

Indicator 3: Student Participation and Performance

Statewide Assessment Participation and Performance for Students with Disabilities

Indicator 3a: Adequate Yearly Progress for Disability Subgroup

District performance compared to State AYP objectives for the disability subgroup.

Burke County Schools did not make adequate yearly progress for the 2005-06 school year.

Indicator 3b: Statewide Assessment Participation Rates for Children with IEPs

Reading participation rates:

Grade State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
3 > 99.6 98.9 No >=95 No
4 > 99.6 98.9 No 100.0 Yes
5 > 99.6 98.8 No 100.0 Yes
6 > 99.4 98.4 No >=95 No
7 > 99.2 98.3 No >=95 Yes
8 > 98.9 98.0 No 100.0 Yes
10 > 95.0 92.0 No 93.55 No

Math participation rates:

Grade State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
3 > 99.6 99.1 No >=95 No
4 > 99.6 99.0 No 100.0 Yes
5 > 99.6 98.9 No 100.0 Yes
6 > 99.2 98.4 No 100.0 Yes
7 > 99.0 98.0 No 100.0 Yes
8 > 98.7 98.0 No 100.0 Yes
10 > 95.0 95.0 Yes >=95 Yes

Indicator 3c: Statewide Assessment Proficiency Rates for Children with IEPs

Reading proficiency rates:

Grade State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
3 > 56.0 55.9 No 59.11 Yes
4 > 53.9 53.7 No 62.57 Yes
5 > 62.3 60.8 No 71.12 Yes
6 > 48.4 48.2 No 52.57 Yes
7 > 53.8 55.0 Yes 64.94 Yes
8 > 58.4 56.4 No 66.27 Yes
10 > 17.0 16.5 No 20.69 Yes

Math proficiency rates:

Grade State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
3 > 61.3 46.9 No 49.78 No
4 > 70.3 39.4 No 39.57 No
5 > 62.9 35.1 No 34.76 No
6 > 58.9 31.6 No 32.2 No
7 > 49.3 31.0 No 39.43 No
8 > 48.3 30.0 No 40.36 No
10 > 47.6 45.0 No 17.74 No
Note
Math proficiency rates decreased substantially due to changes to the State math curriculum and the resetting of the State math standards in 2005-06, increasing their rigor.

Indicator 4a: Suspension/Expulsion Rates

Districts identified as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions of students with disabilities for greater than ten days in a school year. District rates for suspensions/expulstions greater than or equal to twice the state average indicate a significant discrepancy.

Measurement Rate (%) and Discrepancy
State Rate 0.35
District Rate *
Is there a significant discrepancy between the district's rate and the state average? *

Indicator 5: Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) placements for children (age 6 - 21)

Percent of students with IEPs (age 6-21) removed from regular education class for special education services.

LRE State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
Indicator 5a:

Percent of children with IEPs removed from regular class less than 21% of the day.

> 60.59 61.56 Yes 71.26 Yes
Indicator 5b:

Percent of children with IEPs removed from regular class greater than 60% of the day.

< 17.27 16.82 Yes 11.35 Yes
Indicator 5c:

Percent of children with IEPs served in public or private separate schools, residential placements, or homebound or hospital placements.

< 2.23 2.27 No * *


Note: The objective is to increase 5a, and decrease 5b and 5c.

Indicator 6: Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) placements for preschool children (age 3-5).

Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers.

State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
> 73.0 78.0 Yes >=95 Yes

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their 3rd birthday.

State Target (%) State Average (%) Did State Meet Target? LEA (%) Did District Meet Target?
= 100.0 48.4 No 50.0 No